রবিবার, ২৩ ডিসেম্বর, ২০১২

Who Should Manage the Nuclear Weapons Complex, Civilians Or Military?

No general has been prosecuted for torture after the Bush administration

If you mean that rendition stuff, that's because it has been determined they didn't break any laws. Sorry, but if you're talking accountability by the top brass for that, anything they did was at the direction President Bush and his civilian leadership. They can't go down unless he goes down since it appears Bush didn't take the convenient step of throwing one of them under the bus.

If you mean the mistreatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, up to lieutenant colonel rank was tried, as that was the highest level of person who was actually involved (unfortunately, someone didn't read him his rights, letting some charges be dismissed). Above that, his colonel received non-judicial punishment for dereliction of duty, and his general was demoted just because that happened under her command.

But as far as generals in general (haha) being court martialed, it does happen. Just recently they tried the highly respected BG Jeffrey Sinclair of the 82nd Airborne for sexual misconduct with subordinate officers and abuse of his power. This guy was like a god in his unit, practically revered like Col. Kurtz in Apocalypse Now, and he still went down. Even if found not guilty, his career is over.

There is much more accountability if it's military. They don't even have to break a regular criminal law to go down, a simple finding of dereliction of duty is enough. Imagine if our recent high-profile CEOs could have been criminally prosecuted for dereliction of duty, without even having to try to prove intentional fraud.

Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotScience/~3/d_ldFxQglwI/story01.htm

eli whitney blake griffin dunk on kendrick perkins kendrick perkins steve jones emily maynard kola boof burmese python

কোন মন্তব্য নেই:

একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন